Sig Sauer Faces $10 Million Lawsuit above P320 Pistol After Alleged Accidental Discharge Wounds Federal Agent

A previous U.S. Maritime and federal agent has submitted a $10 million lawsuit versus Sig…

A previous U.S. Maritime and federal agent has submitted a $10 million lawsuit versus Sig Sauer Inc. alleging that his holstered Sig P320 — a pistol that the Army’s new sidearm is based on — accidentally discharged, firing a 9mm bullet into his appropriate leg.

The lawsuit, submitted Wednesday on behalf of Keith Slatowski in U.S. District Court in Pennsylvania, alleges his “significant accidents” ended up the final result of the handgun’s “possibly lethal style and design defects” that allow it to hearth without having the consumer pulling the result in, according to a news launch from Slatowski’s attorneys, Jeffrey Bagnell and Robert Zimmerman.

The Army awarded Sig Sauer a deal truly worth up to $580 million in early 2017 to produce the M17 and M18 Modular Handgun Process — a edition of the P320 — to change the service’s Chilly War-period M9 9mm pistol.

Browse Subsequent: Tricare People Frustrated by Lack of Information on COVID-19 Vaccine Availability

Slatowski was issued a P320 as his assistance weapon to use as a deportation officer for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Pennsylvania.

On Sept. 21, 2020, Slatowski was conducting his expected, quarterly firearms coaching in New Castle, Delaware, according to the lawsuit. Although on the firing line, he was instructed to attract and fireplace two rounds at the focus on.

When Slatowski “placed his hand on the pistol grip to attract it out of his holster, the weapon fired,” according to the lawsuit.

“Slatowski never touched the weapon’s induce,” the suit alleges. “The bullet struck him in his higher suitable hip and exited out the again of his reduced thigh, causing sizeable injuries, maceration of tissue, blood reduction, and nerve problems.”

Bagnell described Slatowski as “an exemplary, extremely properly trained general public worker, former Marine, husband and father of 4, who is blessed to be alive,” in accordance to the information release.

Slatowski is suing Sig Sauer for “carelessness, stringent solutions legal responsibility, breach of categorical guarantee, breach of implied warranty, and negligent and intentional infliction of psychological distress in view of Sig’s misrepresentations about the safety of the weapon,” the lawsuit states.

“To this day I’m stunned that a firearms manufacturer would style and design, establish and promote a deadly weapon knowing it could fire devoid of the most very trained soldier, agent, or civilian ever touching the result in,” Slatowski claimed in the launch.

His lawyers say he is presently unavailable for media interviews, according to the release.

Sig Sauer spokesman Michael Marotte explained to Military services.com that the New Hampshire-dependent gun enterprise is not organized to comment on the lawsuit at this time.

This is not the initial lawsuit brought in opposition to Sig Sauer in excess of the P320. Past March, Sig agreed to settle a course-action lawsuit that needed the corporation to reimburse entrepreneurs of the P320 pistol who paid out for repairs or upgrades to stop an alleged security glitch, which could trigger the weapon to fire unintentionally.

The course-motion go well with claimed that P320 pistols built just before Aug. 8, 2017, do not include a mechanical disconnector, a aspect that blocks the pistol’s means to fireplace when the slide and barrel are in an unlocked condition.

Sig Sauer’s absolutely free Voluntary Up grade Application, made available to any individual who obtained the pistol right before Aug. 8, 2017, features the new disconnector feature, enterprise officials have stated.

Slatowski’s lawsuit argues that the P320 structure “possessed an insufficient sear-striker relationship, even soon after implementing a ‘voluntary upgrade’ application for the gun an insufficient inside striker safety and lacked any exterior protection or tabbed bring about protection,” the lawsuit states.

In addition to Slatowski’s scenario, the lawsuit argues that the P320’s alleged flaw has resulted in around 28 accidental discharge incidents involving legislation enforcement officers. About 15 of those have resulted in injuries, according to the lawsuit.

The Army’s new Modular Handgun Procedure — which is staying adopted by all of the expert services — characteristics an upgraded style in excess of the first P320 and has “passed the U.S. Army’s tests protocols,” in accordance to Sig officials.

Armed service.com achieved out to the Military to see whether any soldiers have expert accidental discharge incidents with the MHS, but Program Govt Workplace Soldier could not right away deliver an answer.

— Matthew Cox can be attained at [email protected] forces.com.

Similar: Sig Sauer to Settle Lawsuit Around Alleged Protection Glitch in P320 Pistol

Present Total Report

© Copyright 2021 Military.com. All rights reserved. This content may possibly not be released, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.